ABSTRACT
The need for ethics review committees (ERCs) is imperative in the conduct of research to ensure the protection of the rights; safety and well-being of research participants. However; the capacities of most ERCs in Africa are limited in terms of trained experts; competence; resources as well as standard operating procedures. The aim of this report is to share experiences of one of the local institutional ERCs; the Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI)/All Africa Leprosy and Tuberculosis Rehabilitation and Training Center (ALERT) Ethics Review Committee (AAERC); to other ERCs found in academic and research institutions inthe Country. In this report; we used an empirical approach to reviewarchived documents of the AAERC Secretariat to assess the Committee's strengths and weaknessesThe experiences of the AAERC in terms of its composition; routine work activities; learning practices and pitfalls that require general attention are summarized. In spite of this summary; the Committee strongly acknowledges the functions and roles of other ERCs in the Country. In addition; an independent assessment of the Committee's activity in general is warranted to evaluate its performance and further assess the level of awareness or oversights among researchers about the roles of ERCs